Award-Winning Chicago Personal Injury Lawyer - Securing Justice
for Illinois Injury Victims - Over $450 Million Recovered
The Paragard IUD is under scrutiny as thousands of women have filed lawsuits, claiming the device broke during removal and caused serious injuries, with some women losing their fertility due to sharp plastic fragments being left behind.
Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers has experience handling similar mass tort cases and can help you seek compensation. We have a proven track record of fighting for victims harmed by defective medical devices, and we are ready to guide you through every step of the process.
Our defective medical device attorneys understand how devastating these injuries can be, and we will do everything we can to get you the compensation you need to move forward.
Paragard IUD lawsuits have been consolidated into a multi-district litigation (MDL) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. There are more than 2,800 pending Paragard IUD lawsuits in federal court, reflecting the device’s ongoing legal challenges. The FDA initiated a safety review after seeing an uptick in reported breakages during removal, and over 7,000 complaints have been recorded in its Adverse Event Reporting System.
The Paragard multidistrict litigation (MDL) – MDL No. 2974 – is continuing to grow, adding new plaintiff claims every month. Even though the first Paragard bellwether trials have been scheduled, no final verdicts or settlements have come down yet. If you’ve suffered harm from the Paragard IUD, you still have time to speak with a Paragard attorney, you should do so as soon as possible, as there will come a point when it is too late to join the Paragard MDL.
Over the past few years, the Paragard lawsuits have seen numerous developments. Below are some of the latest ones:
January 13 – Judge Clears Way for First Paragard Trial
A federal judge has denied Teva’s emergency effort to stop the first Paragard IUD case from going to trial later this month, explaining that any appeals of earlier decisions will have to wait until after the jury rules on the case.
The first bellwether trial is set to start on January 20, 2026. This will be the very first Paragard lawsuit heard by a jury and marks a critical moment as the main facts and evidence are publicly tested for the first time.
January 6 – Cases Total Over 4,000
As of January 2026, the Paragard MDL continued to expand, with over 4,000 claims filed and pending in federal court. As the lawsuits grow in number, parties on both sides are preparing for the first cases to make it to trial.
December 9, 2025 – 91 New Filings in November
Plaintiffs continued to come forward in November, adding 91 new Paragard filings.
November 4 – Paragard MDL Adds 63 New Cases
Activity remained steady in October, with 63 new Paragard lawsuits entered into the already sizable pool of pending Paragard IUD lawsuits. More families are joining the litigation as the court and lawyers prepare cases for potential trials in the new year.
October 2 – Three Bellwether Trials Set
The presiding judge now has three key Paragard bellwether trials scheduled for early 2026—in January, March, and May. These highly anticipated cases are central to testing long-term claims before juries and will likely shape future settlement talks or trial strategy for everyone involved.
September 23 – Scheduling Order Maps Path to First Trial
The latest court order maps out deadlines leading directly up to the very first bellwether trial scheduled for January 2026. With expert reports and final trial preparations now officially tracked, parties are switching focus from evidence gathering to getting their strongest cases in front of juries.
September 20 – Paragard MDL Grows as Trial Nears
With 3,569 Paragard cases now pending, the lawsuit count remains on a slow and steady incline as court dates for bellwether trials come into view.
August 12 – Rules for Expert Testimony Issued
This month, the judge formalized detailed rules around expert testimony, putting time limits on depositions, setting guidelines for sharing invoices and “reliance lists,” and confirming when each side’s experts will be questioned. The order got things started for expert depositions, beginning with Dr. Jimmy Mays and David Kessle.
August 1 – Paragard Copper IUD MDL Reaches 3,529 Cases
The case count as of August 1 brought the active Paragard lawsuits pending to 3,529. The core concern continues to center on claims that the device breaks inside plaintiffs’ bodies during removal.
July 11 – Bellwether Trial Dates Formally Set
A new court order officially locked in dates for the first three Paragard bellwether trials across early 2026.
July 7 – Delaware Plaintiff Files New Suit
One plaintiff from Delaware filed a Paragard IUD lawsuit tied to a 2021 Paragard removal that ended with part of the device left inside her. The impacted patient now claims harm based on retained parts and failures, putting additional product defect claims in play.
July 2 – Paragard IUD MDL Reaches 3,474 Pending Actions
Summertime brought another steady increase in filings, according to the July status report: 3,474 Paragard cases are now moving through the Paragard IUD MDL.
June 19 – Paragard Settlement Pressure Builds
With discovery wrapping up and the calendar ticking closer to real trials, both plaintiffs and manufacturers started to feel the rising urge to talk about potential Paragard settlements. Plaintiffs want closure, while companies face increasing risk of huge jury verdicts.
June 3 – Paragard IUD MDL Grows to 3,330 Cases
Headed into June, Paragard’s steady surge saw the master docket climb to 3,330 lawsuits as more people stepped forward to share their stories.
May 17 – Three Bellwether Trials Confirmed
The court confirmed that three bellwether trial dates would serve as turning points in ongoing settlement decision-making as 2026 approaches.
May 2 – Paragard IUD MDL Reaches 3,252 Cases
The case count continues to grow, totaling 3,252 Paragard lawsuits in active national litigation as of May.
April 29 – First Bellwether Case Selected
The court formally picked the very first bellwether jury for the Paragard IUD MDL, making it clear that the January 2026 trial date is more than theoretical.
April 2 – Paragard IUD MDL Reaches 3,036 Cases
Over 3,000 lawsuits filled the Paragard MDL by April as consolidation and centralized handling proceeded with future trial teams close to being announced.
April 1 – Ongoing Discovery Disputes Addressed
To try to avoid further hold-ups, the court stepped in to finally iron out hitches about document requests and witness scheduling before the critical discovery is complete.
March 3 – New Cases Added
February added another 28 pending lawsuits, showing the Paragard litigation continues gaining momentum.
February 12 – Dozens of Cases Dismissed as Time-Barred
The federal judge dismissed a block of Paragard lawsuits, holding that they were filed after state statutes of limitation had already expired. This likely pushes some claimants out while focusing effort on those who still meet various deadlines.
February 11 – Bellwether Trials Delayed
Court leadership decided to pause earlier trial scheduling, delaying the first bellwether trials. The first jury cases will now begin a bit later, in January 2026.
February 5 – New Cases Added
55 new cases were added to the multidistrict litigation in January. That puts the total at 2,937.
January 28 – Settlement Discussions Moving Forward
Paragard settlement discussions are moving forward, with potential payouts based on the severity of injuries caused by broken Paragard IUDs. Some women and plaintiffs contend that they’ve experienced significant complications and injuries from Paragard IUDs, like uterine perforation and other organ perforation leading to life-threatening conditions. Others report minor complications.
The first Paragard bellwether trial is tentatively scheduled for December 1, 2025, with the second trial set for February 2, 2026.
October 24 – Custodial File Ruling
Judge Leigh Martin May rules that defendants must provide the custodial files by December 11, 2024.
October 10 – Teva Pharmaceuticals Pays $450 mMillion to Settle Fraud Allegations
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. agreed to pay $450 million to settle Medicare fraud allegations, raising concerns about the company’s focus on profits over patient safety in the Paragard litigation.
October 7 – Updated on Motion to Compel
The plaintiffs’ motion to compel custodial documents is granted.
September 19 – FDA Safety Reviews
FDA launches safety review into dangers of Paragard IUDs. However, it has been reportedly difficult to get any information about the review.
September 18 – Depositions
Plaintiffs will depose Dr. Barton Cobert on November 25, 2024, in Baltimore about a 2010 pharmacovigilance audit of Paragard, which examined compliance with regulatory safety standards.
September 12 – Teva’s Motion to Dismiss Paragard Lawsuits
Teva moved to dismiss 236 Paragard lawsuits, claiming they are time-barred by statutes of limitations and repose
September 2 – Plaintiff’s File Motion to Amend
The plaintiffs filed a motion to amend the complaint to add Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. as a defendant. Defendants opposed, claiming plaintiffs had not shown necessary diligence in adding Teva.
August 31 – Paragard IUD Warning Update
Paragard IUD warning to be updated, but the warning remains vague and fails to fully address the severity and potential consequences of IUD breakage.
August 28 – Defendants Object to Custodial Files Request
Defendants object to plaintiffs’ request for custodial files, arguing that it is too broad and that plaintiffs never asked for these files before. They also say they have met all deadlines and acted in good faith.
August 8 – Plaintiff’s File Motion to Compel Custodial Files
Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel defendants to produce the custodial files for 31 newly identified custodians, noting a nearly two-year delay after a court order. This delay has hampered the plaintiffs’ investigation and discovery, and they request that the court address the issue at the defendants’ expense.
June 6 – Case Management Order and Choice of Law
Case Management Order establishing guidelines regarding choice of law. Choice of law primarily follows the original venue or jurisdiction, but there are procedures for challenging it if the venue is improper.
June 3 – New Cases Added to Multidistrict Litigation
39 new cases were added to the Paragard IUD class action MDL, putting the total number of cases at 2,690.
May 8 – Change in Structure of Plaintiff’s Leadership Committee
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia recently changed the structure of the Plaintiffs’ Leadership Committee in the Paragard IUD lawsuit. Several members were removed, a few were reassigned, and three new members joined. The changes are to make the legal process run more smoothly.
February 2 – More Paragard IUD Cases Filed
The Paragard IUD lawsuit has 2,444 claims pending.
September 20 – Paragard Lawsuit MDL Continues to Grow
The Paragard class action MDL has grown to 2,147 cases, with 53 new filings in the past month. Since early 2023, there have been more than 500 Paragard IUD lawsuits filed.
August 29 – Revised Scheduling Order
Judge Leigh Martin May issued a revised scheduling order that extends certain deadlines: Case-specific fact discovery will end on February 9, 2024; expert discovery will finish by May 10, 2024; and the first bellwether trial is set to take place on October 28, 2024.
June 30 – Some Cases May be Dismissed
Plaintiffs who missed the November 2022 deadline for submitting their Plaintiff Fact Sheet may have their cases dismissed.
May 24 – Dispute Over Choice-of-Law
In the Paragard MDL, a dispute has arisen over how to apply choice-of-law rules. Plaintiffs want a more flexible approach, while defendants prefer uniform standards to prevent delays in the litigation.
February 27 – Procedures for Selecting Bellweather Cases
Judge Leigh Martin May establishes the procedure for selecting bellwether trial cases.
January 17 – Settlement Mediator Named
Judge M. Gino Brogdon Sr. has been named the lawsuit settlement mediator, but no urgent settlement talks have started yet because the trial is still too far away to create real pressure.
December 28 – 30 New Paragard Lawsuits Filed
30 new cases were added to the Paragard MDL, bringing the total to 1,528 cases.
December 2 – 51 More Paragard Lawsuits
51 more people filed Paragard IUD lawsuits, bringing the total to 1,498 Paragard MDL cases.
September 27 – First Bellwether Trial Announced
Judge May announced that the first bellwether trial in the Paragard MDL is set for May 2024.
June 23 – 177 New Paragard IUD Breakage Lawsuits Added
A total of 177 new Paragard IUD lawsuits were added, raising the total number of cases to 1,192. While this is the largest jump in Paragard claims so far, the multidistrict litigation is still moving slowly, and no bellwether trials have been scheduled yet.
March 22 – Status Conference
A status conference for the Paragard MDL was held. It focused on the status of fact sheets as well as responses to plaintiffs’ requests for documents.
March 16 – 959 Paragard Lawsuits
The number of Paragard lawsuits in the MDL reached 959.
February 18 – New Paragard Claims Filed Each Month
There are 876 cases in the Paragard MDL, with roughly 100 new Paragard claims filed each month. At the most recent status conference, a disagreement about how plaintiff profile forms should be worded was settled.
January 18 – More Plaintiffs in Paragard Class Action Lawsuit MDL
The Paragard class action lawsuit keeps seeing more plaintiffs, with 732 lawsuits now in the multidistrict litigation.
September 22 – Motion to Dismiss Denied
The defendants’ motion to dismiss based on preemption was denied.
September 21 – Motion to Dismiss
A hearing was held in the MDL class action regarding a motion to dismiss pending federal Paragard lawsuits.
February 28 – FDA Sends Letter to CooperSurgical
The FDA issued a letter to CooperSurgical regarding a potentially misleading promotional video about the Paragard IUD, requesting a response within 15 days.
December 16 – Paragard Lawsuits Transferred to MDL
More than 30 Paragard lawsuits from different districts were transferred to a Paragard MDL in the Northern District of Georgia. At that time, there were nearly 60 cases. Judge Leigh Martin May was assigned to the MDL.
The current Paragard IUD lawsuit is about the injuries caused to women by the Paragard IUD while it was being used as intended and as a result of the removal process. In many cases, parts of the copper IUD broke off and remained inside the woman’s body.
In some of these cases, women had to undergo surgery to remove the broken fragments, sometimes requiring a hysterectomy. The plaintiffs in the Paragard IUD MDL assert that the Paragard IUD was defective in its design, as it continued to break off in nearly the same way for thousands of women.
It also centers around the failure of Teva Pharmaceuticals USA to warn patients that the medical device could break and cause serious, sometimes life-threatening, complications. The Paragard lawsuits allege that this defect and the failure to warn by Teva Pharmaceuticals and CooperSurgical demonstrate negligence on the part of the manufacturer.
So, these Paragard lawsuits center around claims of product liability, failure to warn, and negligence against the manufacturers. Paragard litigation has been ongoing since as early as 2020 and involves thousands of injured plaintiffs across the US.
The Paragard IUD lawsuit is actually a multidistrict litigation (MDL). Many people and news outlets are calling it a class action lawsuit because that is what people tend to call large-scale litigation with thousands of different plaintiffs.
As a result, you may also hear the news refer to it as the Paragard MDL or the Paragard class action MDL. It is the same group of cases that are being discussed.
Multidistrict litigation is similar to a class action lawsuit, except for a few key differentiators. The Paragard MDL is being tried at the federal level, as multidistrict litigation can only exist within the federal court system.
Whereas a class action lawsuit combines all plaintiffs into a single lawsuit, the Paragard MDL will group similar cases together and make certain decisions about those cases in a single court.
However, each claimant retains their individual lawsuit, which doesn’t occur in class actions. Based on the outcomes of some of the cases that take place in MDL litigation, the manufacturer can decide on the Paragard settlements it will offer to other defendants with similar cases.
As of February 2025, nearly 3,000 Paragard IUD lawsuits have been filed. Ten representative cases have been chosen for bellwether trials in 2025, and Judge Leigh Martin May has already denied several motions to dismiss. New lawsuits continue to appear across the country, so if you’ve been harmed by this device, you may still have time to join the litigation.
No official lawsuit settlement amounts have been confirmed regarding Paragard intrauterine device (IUD) cases, but estimates suggest different ranges based on injury severity. There’s no way to know for sure right now what the compensation will be, but it may be something similar to the following:
These figures can change as the Paragard MDL lawsuits move forward, with more severe injuries usually receiving the largest payouts.
The Paragard copper IUD is a T-shaped intrauterine device (IUD) implanted in the uterus to prevent pregnancy. IUD devices are birth control devices. Paragard IUD is made using an inflexible plastic with copper wiring, and it is alleged that it can degrade over time and cause breakage when doctors are trying to remove it. It is hormone-free, and the copper coil acts as a spermicide to damage sperm.
The Paragard intrauterine device (IUD) was touted to be an effective birth control device that could be removed when women wanted their fertility to return or if they no longer needed a birth control device. It was reportedly 99%+ effective at preventing pregnancy.
The Paragard intrauterine device (IUD) is meant to be a long-term birth control option, but many users have reported severe complications when the device breaks, as its structural integrity seems to degrade before its approved period of usage is over. It’s helpful to understand the potential consequences and treatment options when this situation occurs.
When an intrauterine device breaks, it can lead to serious health problems and long-term complications. Understanding these risks is crucial so you can make informed decisions about your care.
If a Paragard IUD breaks while still inside your body, it may embed in or puncture the uterine wall, causing ongoing pain or bleeding. In severe cases, surgical intervention could be needed to remove the Paragard arms and prevent further injury to surrounding organs.
A new study shows that IUD insertion during the postpartum period, especially between 4 days and 6 weeks after delivery, has a higher risk of uterine perforation and expulsion. Individuals who are breastfeeding also face a slightly increased risk of perforation, and those with heavy menstrual bleeding are at greater risk overall.
If the Paragard IUD breaks, fragments of the broken device can lead to infections, including pelvic inflammatory disease. Without prompt treatment, these infections might spread and cause more serious health issues.
Significant damage to the uterus or other reproductive organs may reduce the chance of a future pregnancy. In extreme situations, permanent infertility can happen if a hysterectomy is required to address the injury.
A broken Paragard IUD can raise the risk of an ectopic pregnancy, which happens outside the uterus and can be life-threatening if not treated quickly. If you suspect an ectopic pregnancy, prompt medical care is critical to avoid further complications.
Some individuals continue to experience severe discomfort even after the broken Paragard IUD is removed. Scar tissue or nerve damage around the uterus can lead to ongoing aches or cramping, requiring extra care like pain management or physical therapy.
Beyond the physical risks, victims often face anxiety, depression, and high medical bills. Seeking professional help can reduce both the emotional weight and the financial burden associated with these complications.
Surgery can be necessary when an IUD breaks. Depending on the location and severity of the damage, doctors may use different procedures:
These minimally invasive methods let a doctor look inside the uterus or pelvis to locate and remove broken Paragard IUD fragments. They help reduce the risk of damage to surrounding organs, and recovery time is usually shorter than with larger surgeries.
If the broken pieces are deeply embedded in the uterine wall and cannot be removed without causing significant harm, a hysterectomy may be recommended. This procedure removes the uterus completely, which can end fertility but may be the safest option to protect a patient’s overall health.
Antibiotics can help manage or prevent infections that sometimes arise from broken IUD fragments. If there are signs of inflammation or tissue damage, a doctor may also suggest pain medication or other therapies to reduce discomfort.
Even after the broken device is removed, it’s important to keep an eye on any lingering symptoms. Regular check-ups can catch issues like scarring or ongoing pain, ensuring you receive timely care if more treatments are needed.
To qualify for a Paragard lawsuit, the individual must have:
Essentially, to be eligible for compensation, you have to prove that you used the device and it broke during or before removal within 10 years of when the Paragard IUD was implanted. You also have to have a documented injury.
Many women chose the Paragard IUD as a birth control method, believing it would be both safe and effective. However, numerous Paragard users have reported complications from the Paragard IUD, including infertility, chronic pelvic pain, organ perforation, infections, uterine wall injuries, pelvic inflammatory disease, and ectopic pregnancies. A qualified mass tort attorney is essential for the following reasons:
An experienced Paragard lawyer understands the complexities of IUD product liability litigation and can guide you through the process of filing a Paragard IUD lawsuit. With experience in mass tort and class action cases, they can protect your rights and give you the best chance of obtaining compensation if you experienced a Paragard IUD fracture or breakage.
New Paragard IUD lawsuits are still being filed nationwide, and your attorney can handle everything from gathering medical records to explaining how to file a Paragard IUD claim.
A lawyer will also keep you informed about court orders from the Paragard class action judge, updates on the Paragard class action MDL, and any changes in the lawsuits as they progress through the legal system.
An experienced lawyer in MDL tort cases often has connections to medical professionals, investigators, and expert witnesses who can strengthen your claim. They can arrange specialized tests or expert reviews to validate your injury. With a lawyer’s help, you won’t have to face these challenges on your own.
Calculating compensation can be difficult, especially for non-economic damages like pain and suffering. An experienced lawyer can examine both the financial and emotional impact of your injury, ensuring that intangible losses are not overlooked. They know what calculations are often used to determine these intangible losses, so they can make sure you aren’t leaving any money on the table.
Filing a claim can help you recover medical expenses, lost wages, and other costs stemming from Paragard IUD litigation. Since the device has allegedly caused permanent injuries for some Paragard IUD users, it’s essential to seek help.
By working with a Paragard lawyer, you can hold the manufacturers accountable and protect your future well-being, especially if your injuries prevent you from resuming normal activities.
Filing a legal claim can involve strict deadlines, as well as proper documentation and paperwork. An experienced Paragard lawyer monitors these timelines so you don’t risk losing your right to a settlement. Trying to sort through the rules on your own might cause confusion, and missing a filing date can ruin your chances for financial recovery.
If your case goes to trial, a lawyer will present your side of the story effectively, backed by evidence and expert opinions. They will speak on your behalf, respond to claims from the opposing side, and handle any complex legal motions. Court proceedings can drag out over months or even years, so having someone there to direct the negotiation and litigation process is essential.
One of the biggest benefits of hiring an experienced Paragard lawyer is the peace of mind that comes from knowing a professional is handling the legal side. This allows you to concentrate on healing and reclaiming your life after Paragard IUD breakage or other severe complications.
If you’ve suffered complications and harm from a Paragard IUD device or another defective medical device, Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers can help you every step of the way. Here’s what we can do:
Our product liability attorneys have the experience, resources, and commitment to fight for the compensation you deserve.
At Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers, we work on a contingency fee basis. This means we do not charge anything upfront for our legal services. Instead, we receive a set percentage of the settlement or award we help you secure. In the event we are not able to win your case, you don’t have to pay anything for the services of our Paragard lawyers.
To file a lawsuit against Paragard IUD with Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers, you can generally expect the following process.
First, you will need to schedule a free consultation with our Paragard attorneys to determine whether you have a case meeting the criteria outlined in the Paragard MDL or if you might have a case outside of the Paragard IUD MDL. In the event the attorney doesn’t believe you have enough evidence to move forward, they will let you know.
Should you decide to proceed, your Paragard IUD lawyers will start the process of collecting evidence. This could include witness testimony from your doctor and specialists, as well as medical bills, receipts, and insurance documents.
In the event your claim is one of the Paragard IUD device cases used as a bellwether trial, your attorney may need to consult with experts to build a strong case proving your injuries were caused by the Paragard device.
It is important to have an idea of how much you’ve lost financially as a result of being injured by a Paragard IUD. This can mean totaling up the loss of work hours, the total amount of medical bills associated with the Paragard IUD and its complications, and any other expenses. This can give you a better idea of what would constitute a fair settlement.
After collecting all of this data to support your case, your Paragard injury lawyer will file all necessary paperwork with the courts. It is important to do this correctly, as incorrectly filed paperwork or paperwork that misses key deadlines can cause your case to be dismissed. If this happens, you may not get the opportunity to file Paragard IUD lawsuits again.
It will take time before all of the new Paragard IUD lawsuits make it through the courts and before settlements are offered.
A big part of the Paragard lawsuit is advocating to be a part of a specific tier. Based on past cases, there could be three tiers of settlements related to the severity of the injuries sustained. The group with the most severe injuries is likely to see the highest payouts.
Many Paragard intrauterine device (IUD) users have filed lawsuits against Teva Pharmaceuticals in the Northern District of Georgia, alleging severe complications from their Paragard devices. If you plan to file a Paragard IUD lawsuit or join the ongoing Paragard litigation, you’ll need clear and detailed evidence to support your case.

Records or statements showing that the Paragard IUD broke or fractured are crucial. Your doctor’s notes and imaging results can show how the Paragard copper IUD caused you harm. They demonstrate how this birth control device malfunctioned, whether pieces were surgically removed, or if it led to further complications and injuries, such as infection or additional surgical intervention.
These documents are vital for proving the extent of your injuries and the medical expenses you are seeking in the Paragard MDL.
Records of your conversations with doctors can show that you reported pain, breakage, or other problems tied directly to the Paragard intrauterine device (IUD). This evidence helps strengthen a Paragard lawsuit by documenting that your injuries or complications came from the device and not another source.
Medical professionals, product engineers, and other specialists can examine your injuries and determine if the Paragard IUD directly caused them. Their professional credentials and knowledge help explain complicated issues like device function and potential defects.
A well-presented expert opinion may connect the manufacturer’s actions or inactions to your specific harm, strengthening your claim.
Images can capture key details, such as the Paragard IUD breaking and showing fragments or injuries linked to the device. These visuals help present a clear, direct message that can be easier for judges and juries to grasp than technical documents or oral testimony alone.
For instance, a photo showing a Paragard IUD fractured, and a piece removed from the uterus could be a powerful way to illustrate the cause of your medical issues. This type of evidence can leave a lasting impression, helping make your case more credible and memorable.
Records from official sources, such as the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System, highlight similar experiences from other Paragard users. This data shows a pattern of Paragard IUD failure or complications that may be relevant to your lawsuit.
Showing that the device manufacturer was aware of multiple negative outcomes yet failed to act can be a good way to show negligence.
Family members, friends, or coworkers can offer firsthand accounts of how the Paragard IUD complication affected your day-to-day life. Their stories may confirm your symptoms over time or show how you had to change your routine to manage pain or other health problems.
Healthcare providers who treated you and saw the injuries firsthand may also serve as witnesses to the device’s harmful effects.
Document how the complications and injuries have affected your life, including lost workdays, enduring pain, or family stress. This information can be powerful in a Paragard class action MDL, helping your Paragard lawyer demonstrate the full scope of your hardships and justify the financial compensation you are seeking.
Compiling this evidence will help strengthen your case. Having the right documentation can make all the difference in pursuing a successful outcome in Paragard cases.
There are different types of damages that can be recovered in Paragard IUD lawsuits. These include economic damages related to financial losses and non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering. Common types of damages related to Paragard IUD lawsuits are:
In the event your loved one died as a result of serious Paragard IUD complications or injuries they sustained from the Paragard IUD device, it is possible for family members to seek compensation for their loved one’s medical bills, pain and suffering, funeral expenses, and other non-economic damages.
To qualify to file Paragard IUD lawsuits, you need to have used the Paragard device and suffered complications, such as breakage during removal or the need for additional treatment.
Our attorneys will look at your medical records to determine how your health has been affected and uncover any financial or personal losses you’ve faced. We can then tell you if you have a valid claim and guide you on how to proceed.
Settlement amounts in the Paragard IUD lawsuits are estimated based on injury severity, though no settlements or verdicts exist yet. This is based on past settlement and verdict info of similar types of cases. Usually, there are different categories of payment levels, known as tiers, which are based on the severity of the injuries and losses.
It’s important to understand that no two Paragard cases are the same. Settlement amounts can vary widely depending on several key factors.
Medical Expenses
Even when insurance covers part of the treatment, out-of-pocket expenses can accumulate quickly and place significant financial strain on families.
Lost Wages and Time Off Work
Serious Paragard-related complications can interrupt your ability to work.
Missing work and income may make it difficult to keep up with rent, mortgage payments, or household expenses.
Loss of Future Earning Capacity
Some injuries have long-term consequences that affect future income.
Lower earning potential over time should be reflected in settlement or verdict amounts.
Emergency Medical Care
Unexpected complications can lead to urgent and costly medical and surgical interventions.
Pain, Suffering, and Emotional Distress
The impact of a Paragard injury isn’t limited to physical harm.
Ultimately, settlements should always account for psychological suffering, therapy or counseling needs, and loss of enjoyment of life where applicable.
Additional Out-of-Pocket Expenses
Hidden costs often also add up over time:
All of these expenses can influence the final settlement value.
Quality of Legal Representation
The experience and skill of your attorney also matter.
Strong legal representation can significantly improve the outcome of a Paragard case. Your Paragard lawyer can help victims secure fair settlements or judgments that cover both immediate and long-term needs.
Paragard is an FDA-approved birth control device that has worked safely for some women, but there have also been serious reports of breakage and injury. Many of these incidents involve fragments lodging in or near the uterus, requiring additional medical treatment or even surgery.
Because of these risks, it’s important to weigh all potential benefits and complications before deciding if Paragard is right for you.

As of January 2026, the FDA has not issued any active recalls on the Paragard IUD, even though there have been more than 54,000 adverse event reports. The copper IUD device is still being manufactured and sold in the market. However, according to an FDA report, Teva Pharmaceuticals only recalled two Paragard lots in 2014 on claims of failing to prevent pregnancies.
Although research suggests that Paragard is causing patients injuries, there is no plan for a Paragard recall at the time this article was written. Paragard may continue to be used on a wide scale and continue to expose women to potential health problems.
Yes, the Paragard intrauterine device has been approved by the FDA as a non-hormonal birth control option. However, the FDA has investigated Paragard multiple times and warns that there are risks, including breakage, that women should be careful about.
More than 7,000 adverse event reports in the FDA’s database describe breakage linked to this device. It’s crucial to speak with a healthcare professional and understand these potential dangers before choosing Paragard.
At this point, Paragard’s design flaws and injuries have led to thousands of Paragard IUD lawsuits being filed against its manufacturers, and they’ve been grouped into multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the Northern District of Georgia, where new cases continue to be added. The Paragard MDL judge is Leigh Martin May, who oversees these proceedings.
There may be upcoming bellwether trials that could encourage settlement talks. The cases focus on reports of Paragard breakage and other serious complications, and the litigation is still in progress.
Although many refer to this case as a Paragard class action lawsuit, the current legal claims against Paragard are actually gathered under multidistrict litigation (MDL), sometimes called the Paragard class action MDL, in the Northern District of Georgia.
Unlike a class action lawsuit, the Paragard IUD multidistrict litigation allows each individual to bring their own case while still benefiting from a streamlined process for pretrial matters. This setup helps coordinate discovery and court rulings, but keeps the Paragard IUD removal lawsuits separate so each plaintiff’s injuries and damages are addressed on their own merit.
Although the Paragard copper IUD is intended to serve as a long-term birth control option, some women have experienced serious complications that can last well beyond the initial removal. These issues may include breakage, leading to surgery, or even permanent reproductive damage.
Other long-term risks involve chronic pain, infections, and a possible higher chance of ectopic pregnancy. These ongoing effects can create emotional and financial burdens, highlighting the importance of understanding the potential risks before deciding on this device.
An IUD is a small device placed in the uterus to prevent pregnancy, usually made of plastic or copper. It can stay in place for several years and is often considered a reliable form of birth control. However, complications can occur, leading to serious health concerns or Paragard copper IUD lawsuits.

The statute of limitations is the legal time limit you have to file a lawsuit. The Paragard lawsuit deadline varies by state, but typically is between two and four years from the date of injury or the date you discovered the injury. However, the Paragard MDL is not governed by an individual state’s statute of limitations.
You may be eligible to file a Paragard lawsuit even if it has been a few years since the Paragard IUD break caused your injuries. There is still time to discuss your case with a Paragard IUD lawyer. You should do so as soon as possible, as there will come a point when it is too late to join the Paragard MDL.
No Paragard injury lawyer can give you an exact timeframe on how long it will take to settle your case. Historically, MDLs take time to go through federal court. The federal Paragard IUD lawsuits still need to go through bellwether trials.
It could be a few years from when the first cases are filed to settlements. While this might seem like a really long time, trying many cases in groups through the Paragard MDL is much faster than if thousands of cases needed to be tried individually.
Since the Paragard MDL has already been created, it is considerably along in the process. The first Paragard case was filed only a few years ago. This means the process should take less time from this point forward than if the first case were filed today.
It is also worth considering the impact of not filing your case. If you have serious financial debt as a result of the extra surgeries and procedures caused by a defective Paragard IUD, you will have to manage those payments on your own until you pay them off.
However, if you file a claim in the Paragard MDL and it is successful, you can use that to pay off those expenses. It isn’t your fault that the IUD you were told was safe broke. You shouldn’t be solely responsible for paying for it.
Not at the moment. As a global Paragard settlement has yet to be reached, it is unclear what the Paragard lawsuit settlement amounts will look like. Once the Paragard group discovery phase and bellwether trials are finished, it will be clearer what Paragard injury victims may be eligible for in terms of financial compensation. However, similar cases can give us an idea.
A significant settlement has been reported where Bayer, the company associated with the Mirena IUD, agreed to a $12.7 million settlement covering just over 4,000 cases involving the product, which moved around in the body and injured organs. This settlement averages out to around $30,000 per claim.
As the bellwether trials go through the court system, there will be more settlement data available. This list will be updated with the latest information about Paragard settlements as the data becomes available.
Like in other medical device cases, there are several defendants in the Paragard lawsuits. In cases like these, the manufacturer and distributor of a defective product are typically named as defendants. Most Paragard lawsuits filed are against:

If you use Paragard IUDs and think they may have caused your injuries, you may be able to file a lawsuit to collect compensation. Begin by seeing if you have a case by consulting with a Paragard IUD lawsuit attorney. At Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers, our experience with prior mass tort cases gives us an advantage when it comes to helping you file a Paragard lawsuit.
Contact a personal injury lawyer for a free case review.
Specific Cases We Handle
All content undergoes thorough legal review by experienced attorneys, including Jonathan Rosenfeld. With 25 years of experience in personal injury law and over 100 years of combined legal expertise within our team, we ensure that every article is legally accurate, compliant, and reflects current legal standards.